Back again, this time I wanted to briefly talk about Mr Koizumi's visit to yasukuni shrine. Its is a touchy subject because it is the national shrine dedicated to those who gave their lives for Japan in wars past but it also cares for the remains of some class A war criminals. There are many smaller shrines located throughout the country all to remember japanese veterans. In fact I visited one in Shiga-ken sometime last month while touring the Nagahama area (more on that in another post). In a country focused on respect and saving face, these shrines are kept in very good condition which is something that perhaps western countries should seek to mimic.
Yet the visit by Koizumi to this shrine is controversial to say the least. Korean and Chinese nationals believe that adequate compensation hasn't been received and that the Japanese government has done an inadequate job of "apologizing" for war crimes. In fact some things just don't seem to make sense, for example Japan does offer monthly payments to those who have suffered yet they only make payments for those who reside in Japan. What they hey is that ? I mean that just makes no sense whatsoever. Its in effect a limited admission of guilt, yet it just makes the situation worse as foreign nationals are told they suffered yet receive no monetary compensation. Bitterness remains, its a marketers worst nightmare.
In Mr Koizumi's defense he claims that
A he is visiting as a private citizen
B he is praying for the ending of all wars
This is understandably a reasonable stance, yet when you look into the details of it one is left with some very undainty details. I for one am shaking my head at the crassness of it. If as Mr Kozimui says he is visiting the shrine as a private citizen then why did he sign his name "Koizumi Prime Minister Japan" in the visitors book ? Indeed why does he sign the guest book at all ? He just stokes the fires more by doing so. Or perhaps a better question, if he is visiting as a private citizen then why does he use official use only entrances to enter the shrine or for that matter does he wear the traditional kimono symbolizing his position ?
These and many other questions were answered the day before yesterday when Mr Koizumi visited the shrine this time in a business suit and by entering through the main/public entrance. This is itself yet another admission of guilt. If his previous actions were as a private citizen then why change anything ? Perhaps it was because of a recent court ruling in Osaka saying that the Prime Ministers visit to the shrine is in violation of the constitution. Yet any bonehead can see that Mr Koizumi clearly rode to the shrine in an official government car, so in fact he DID continue to use the office of Prime Minister when attending the shrine. Sometimes its just shocking how poor a job the government does. On the news they interviewed one of the PM's advisors who proclaimed that his adjusted visitation was kosher and that there should not be any international reaction. Its almost as if the Japanese government believes that if they have enough meetings they can decide what foreign reaction will be to domestic policy. Morons....
but I digress.
The facts are that Mr Koizumi has visited the shrine as PM of Japan. The more he denies it, the more he sounds like Chicken Little when he proclaimed the sky was falling.
The regional reaction was swift. China has cancelled its scheduled foreign minister meeting with japan, and south korea has also cancelled its cabinet level meetings with japan. If the goal was to torpedo any regional good feelings than the visit to the shrine was a smashing success.
Mr Koizumi can claim whatever he wants to, and perhaps even sleeps well at night. The facts are that he has seriously damaged regional stability and it makes me question the rationale of a man I would otherwise say is doing a rather good job of it.
The good news is that this will be his last visit as prime minister as he is due to step down from party leadership next september. At least this is his claim and I for one do believe that. The sticky situation will fall to his replacement at the LDP. Hopefully discretion will rear its reasonable head and the PM will not visit the shrine but instead make public statements about the abolishment of war etc etc.
This is a very complex situation for example, why do Chinese people think they have a say in Japanese domestic policy ? I mean if Native Americans protested Bush visiting Arlington cemetary, guess where the american public would tell them to shove it ? Yet is it not the job of the leadership to facilitate bridges, rather than burning them ? No its not exactly comparable, but this is to make a point.
The Japanese have done a bad job on the international scene of explaining their positions. For example they are the number 2 contributor to the UN, which when not having a scandal does a tremendously wonderful job of fighting problems in the developing world. The Japanese have in fact apologized to China and Korea in the past and they have given money. How many of us knows this ? Language barrier perhaps, but there are quite alot of very good english speakers in this country so methinks the problem lies with the gerontocracy... (more on that in another post)
well thanks for reading my train of thought. From shizuoka this is your humble blogger turning out the light and hitting the hay.